SCOTUS OKs Workforce Cuts     07/08 15:54

   The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's 
plans to downsize the federal workforce.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for 
President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite 
warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of 
thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs.

   The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, 
which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.

   The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of 
the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration 
directive for agencies to undertake job reductions.

   Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her 
colleagues of a "demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's 
legally dubious actions in an emergency posture."

   Jackson warned of enormous real-world consequences. "This executive action 
promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancellation of federal 
programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as 
Congress has created it," she wrote.

   The high court action continued a remarkable winning streak for Trump, who 
the justices have allowed to move forward with significant parts of his plan to 
remake the federal government. The Supreme Court's intervention so far has been 
on the frequent emergency appeals the Justice Department has filed objecting to 
lower-court rulings as improperly intruding on presidential authority.

   The Republican president has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate for 
the work, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through 
DOGE. Musk recently left his role.

   Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs 
via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no 
official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took 
deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been 
let go.

   In May, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration 
needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal 
workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 
refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have 
broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care 
for veterans.

   Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's 
workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by 
DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former 
Democratic President Bill Clinton.

   The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered 
the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take 
effect, including cuts of 40% to 50% at several agencies. Baltimore, Chicago 
and San Francisco were among cities that also sued.

   "Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts 
services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy. This decision does 
not change the simple and clear fact that reorganizing government functions and 
laying off federal workers en masse haphazardly without any congressional 
approval is not allowed by our Constitution," the parties that sued said in a 
joint statement.

   Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, 
Energy, Labor, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also 
applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social 
Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency.

   The case now continues in Illston's court.